Generation Aviation programme evaluation, February 2023 and March 2024
Published 26 September 2024
漏 Crown copyright 2024
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 伊人直播. To view this licence, visit or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at /government/publications/generation-aviation-programme-evaluation/generation-aviation-programme-evaluation-february-2023-and-march-2024
Generation Aviation is an aviation created skills programme that promotes government working with industry and outreach partners to raise the profile of careers in aviation.
The programme was launched in October 2022 in response to the resilience issues experienced in summer of the same year and formed part of the 22-point action plan to address aviation disruption.
The 5 workstreams within Generation Aviation 补谤别:听听
- outreach
- signposting training, careers and opportunities
- championing the sector聽聽
- working in partnership with industry聽聽
- driving research and data
Survey work was conducted to provide a way of monitoring and evaluating the success and awareness of the programme. This meant we could engage with a broad range of stakeholders to hear their views on Generation Aviation.聽聽
This report outlines the results from those Generation Aviation engagement surveys which were conducted internally by DfT. The purpose of these surveys is to monitor engagement with, and attitudes towards, the Generation Aviation skills programme. The results have been used to ensure the work is reflective of the sector鈥檚 views and aid in the continuous improvement of the programme.
Methodology
This report contains results from 2 surveys. The baseline survey was the first engagement survey to be conducted at the beginning of the Generation Aviation campaign. Data was collected between 25 January to 13 February 2023,聽 this is referred to as the February 2023 survey. The second survey is the most recent and data was collected between 7 February to 8 March 2024,聽 this is referred to as the March 2024 survey.
For both surveys the participation link was distributed via email to contacts who previously engaged with Generation Aviation or belong to an entity with an interest in aviation skills, including:聽
- 补颈谤辫辞谤迟蝉听听
- airlines
- ground handling and cargo organisations聽
- businesses and general aviation
- other government departments
- educational institutions
- charity or social enterprises
It should be noted that the link may have been shared more widely around each contact鈥檚 network, meaning that response rates cannot be calculated with certainty.
The ethical implications of this project were minimal. The collection of personal data was undertaken on a public task legal basis. Participants were made aware prior to their participation of the types of personal information that may be collected and the rational for requesting it. They were informed that if their answers contain any identifiable information, then under data protection law the department would be the controller for this information. Data was stored securely and was only accessible to a small team at the DfT. Participants were also made aware that the results would be published in an anonymised and aggregate form.
February 2023
The February 2023 survey was sent to approximately 250 contacts where 100 participants completed the survey. During data cleaning 4 responses were excluded from analysis as they stated they had completed the survey previously and a further 7 responses were excluded due to being identified as duplicates. This left 89 complete responses after data cleaning and gave an estimated response rate of around 36%.聽 Duplicate responses were classed as responses which were completed at the same time within the same organisation (2 or more) or had the same job role listed. In these situations the response of the most senior person was retained or if seniority could not be distinguished the first response received was retained.
Responses that had no name or identified their role as 鈥榥ot relevant鈥� to Generation Aviation were excluded
March 2024
The March 2024 survey was sent to approximately 178 contacts in the aviation sector. Of these, 65 complete responses remained after data cleaning and after 9 responses were excluded from analysis as they stated they had completed the survey previously. The duplicate removal process was not applied during analysis on these results to retain maximum data richness from a variety of stakeholders at multiple levels of seniority within organisations. There was an estimated response rate of around 37% for this survey.
Respondents
Of the 89 respondents in the February 2023 survey, the largest proportion reported living in the south-east (29%), London (18%) and the south-west (12%). There was at least one respondent from each region in the UK. When asking respondents what type of organisation they worked for, 61% self-reported as working in the aviation industry (including airlines, airports, airport services, airfields, manufacturers and suppliers). No further breakdown of industry type was conducted in this survey, although this was applied in the March 2024 survey. A further 18% worked in other organisations (including associations, agencies and those who are self-employed), whilst 7% worked in the charity sector.
Of the 65 respondents who responded to the March 2024 survey, the largest proportion of participants reported living in London and the south-east (25% in each category, respectively). There was at least one respondent from each region in the UK, apart from Scotland. When asking respondents what type of organisation they work for, the aviation industry was the largest group overall (80%), but the largest sub-group within this was Airports (23%). Of those not working in industry, the largest group was educational institutions (13%).
Other caveats used when reviewing the process were:
- convenience sampling was used to recruit for the survey. This is when a sample which is easily accessible is used but it is not necessarily the most representative of the wider target population. We used this method, as we wanted to focus on those who had previously engaged with the team.聽 As a result, there is some selection bias present, as we only contacted those known to the DfT. Therefore, results should be treated with caution and cannot be used to estimate views of the wider population
- this research was cross-sectional, meaning the results were a snapshot of the participants鈥� views at that moment in time and the target sample is not consistent across the two surveys. Therefore, data cannot be used to establish cause and effect or long-term trends
- in the March 2024 survey, airports were contacted earlier on during fieldwork and therefore there may be an overrepresentation of this group in comparison to the February 2023 survey. Due to this, comparisons should be treated with caution
- as not all questions required a response, some respondents skipped certain questions that were not appropriate to them, resulting in different base sizes for different questions. Base sizes will be specified throughout this report
- that in the February 2023 survey, duplicate responses were excluded from analysis. Duplicate responses were identified based upon information given by respondents about the organisation they work at alongside their job title. This data was not required from respondents and so there may be a small number of unidentifiable duplicate responses remaining across the data set from those who did not choose to provide such information
- that no duplication removal process was applied in the March 2024 survey analysis. This is because the February 2023 survey was intended to provide a starting point, a baseline set of results with one respondent per organisation with the most senior acting as a proxy for the wider organisation. In the March 2024 survey, wider reach was prioritised for insight into how successful engagement efforts have been in the last year, across all levels of seniority and across multiple different stakeholder groups. Therefore, any comparisons between the results should be treated with caution as the 2 samples are not directly comparable
Findings summary
The summary of findings were that:
- in February 2023, 64% of respondents felt that the UK government does not do enough to support the aviation sector on aviation skills. In March 2024 this figure had decreased to 55%
- approximately 7 in 10 respondents (69%) in both surveys thought that the aviation industry is completely or mostly responsible for ensuring that future aviation skills are met, whilst around a third (32% in March 2024鈥痸ersus 33% in February 2023) thought that the UK government is completely or mostly responsible
- awareness has improved over the last year. In March 2024, 71% of participants had heard of Generation Aviation (versus 57% in February 2023) and almost half (46%) knew what it was (versus 27% in February 2023).鈥疉round 3 in 10 (29%)鈥痟ad not鈥痟eard of Generation Aviation, but this is a decrease from the 43% recorded in February 2023鈥�. Aviation Ambassadors was the element with most awareness in both those who knew of the programme (97% in March 2024 versus 92% in February 2023) and those who didn鈥檛 (43% in March 2024 versus 34% in February 2023)
- in March 2024, 57% of those who knew of Generation Aviation rated the relationship between the aviation industry and government as good or very good, 17% rated the relationship as poor and 20% rated it as neither poor nor good. Of those who did not know of Generation Aviation, 17% rated the relationship as good or very good, 31% rated it poor or very poor and a further 43% rated it neither poor nor good
- some participants felt engagement with government was working well and that its outreach initiatives were seen as effective. However, many felt that鈥痚ngagement with a more varied team with industry expertise was needed. Recognition of apprenticeships and more public displays of鈥痵upport towards the aviation industry, were also seen as desirable
- multiple respondents valued how Generation Aviation has improved the visibility of the aviation sector through participation in industry events and outreach initiatives. However, the main鈥痵uggestions for improving upon this approach were focused on the increased promotion of the programme in new spaces such as other government departments and local authorities 鈥�
Full research findings
鈥� The term 鈥榥et鈥� is used alongside answer options throughout the chart findings. When given, this indicates that the total proportion across similar answer options has been used. For example:
- Net:agree is the total proportion of those who answered strongly agree or agree and net:disagree is the total proportion of those who answered strongly disagree and disagree
- Net:poor is the total proportion of those who answered very poor or poor and net:good is the total proportion of those who answered good or very good
Relationship with government
For the baseline survey conducted in February 2023, all participants were asked to rate the relationship between the UK government and the aviation industry in the year before the 31st October 2022 (before the Generation Aviation programme launched). Just under 3 in 10 (28%) rated the relationship as good overall, whilst a further 20% thought it was neither poor nor good. Just under half (46%) rated the relationship as poor and a further 6% said they didn鈥檛 know.
In March 2024, just over half of participants (55%) disagreed that the government does enough to support the aviation sector on aviation skills. This was down by 9 percentage points from the February 2023 survey, where 64% disagreed.聽 Only 12% in the March 2024 survey agreed to varying degrees (a slight drop from 15% in February 2023) whereas 28% neither agreed nor disagreed when compared to the earlier survey. Another 5% said they didn鈥檛 know in March 2024 compared with 2% in the February 2023 survey.
The UK government does enough to support the aviation sector on aviation skills?
| Rating | February 2023 (88 responses) | March 2024 (65 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| Net: Agree | 15% | 12% |
| Neither agree nor disagree | 19% | 28% |
| Net: Disagree | 64% | 55% |
| Don鈥檛 know | 2% | 5% |
Engaging with the DfT on aviation skills
In March 2024, around 6 in 10 participants (63%) felt that the aviation sector has some opportunity to engage with the DfT about鈥痑viation skills, an increase from 57% in February 2023.鈥疉 further 22% felt they have lots of opportunities, again an鈥痠ncrease from 6% in February 2023.鈥� However, 6% felt that the aviation industry does not have the opportunity to engage with the DfT about aviation skills. This is a large鈥痙rop in comparison to the 25% recorded in the previous year.
How much, if at all, do you feel the aviation sector has the opportunity to engage with DfT about aviation skills?
| Statements | February 2023 (89 responses) | March 2024 (65 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| No opportunities to engage | 25% | 6% |
| Some opportunities to engage | 57% | 63% |
| Lots of opportunities to engage | 6% | 22% |
| Don鈥檛 know | 12% | 9% |
When asking participants to rate their agreement with various statements about engaging with government, 45% agreed to some extent鈥痶hat they know how to鈥痝et in touch with鈥痶he department about aviation skills, an increase鈥痜rom 33% in February 2023.鈥疉lthough 4 in 10 (39%)鈥痙isagreed鈥痺ith this statement, it was an鈥痠mprovement鈥痜rom the 54%鈥痳ecorded in the previous year.鈥�嬄�
Approximately 1 in 5 (21%) agreed to some extent that they knew what support is available from the department on aviation鈥痵kills鈥�(versus 13% in February 2023).鈥�疉 much larger proportion (57%) disagreed with this statement, but this was still an improvement from the鈥�64% who disagreed with this in February 2023.
Please rate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about engaging with DfT on aviation skills
| Statement | Net: Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Net: Agree | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I know how to get in touch with DfT about aviation skills (February 2023, 89 responses) | 54% | 11% | 33% | 2% |
| I know what support is available from DfT about aviation skills (February 2023, 89 responses) | 64% | 19% | 13% | 3% |
| I know how to get in touch with DfT about aviation skills (March 2024, 65 responses) | 39% | 17% | 45% | 0% |
| I know what support is available from DfT about aviation skills (March 2024, 65 responses) | 57% | 22% | 21% | 0% |
Responsibility for aviation skills
In the March 2024 survey, almost 7 in 10 (69%) thought the aviation industry is completely or mostly responsible for ensuring that the UK鈥檚 future aviation skills needs are鈥痬et. This is the same proportion as recorded in February 2023. Around 1 in 3 (32%) thought the UK government is鈥痗ompletely or mostly responsible. A similar proportion was recorded in February 2023鈥�(33%).鈥嬄�
In the March 2024 survey, 26% thought the aviation industry is somewhat responsible, with only 2% thinking they are not responsible at all (28% and 2%鈥痳espectively in February 2023). Over half (56%) thought the UK government is somewhat responsible (versus 55% in February 2023), while 9% thought they are not at鈥痑ll responsible for ensuring that future aviation skills needs are met (a decrease from the 12% recorded in February 2023).
How responsible, if at all, do you think the UK government and aviation industry are for ensuring future aviation skills needs are met?
| Organisation | Not at all responsible | Somewhat responsible | Mostly responsible | Completely responsible | Don鈥檛 know/no response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK government (February 2023, 89 responses) | 12% | 55% | 26% | 7% | 0% |
| Aviation industry (February 2023, 89 responses) | 2% | 28% | 44% | 25% | 1% |
| UK government (March 2024, 64 responses) | 9% | 56% | 19% | 13% | 3% |
| Aviation industry (March 2024, 65 responses) | 2% | 26% | 43% | 26% | 3% |
Awareness of Generation Aviation
Awareness of the Generation Aviation programme has improved over the last鈥痽ear. In March 2024,鈥痑lmost three quarters (71%) had heard鈥痮f the Generation Aviation programme (versus鈥�57% in February 2023) and almost half (46%)鈥痥new what it was (versus 27% in February 2023). Around 3 in 10 respondents (29%) had not鈥痟eard of the Generation Aviation programme,鈥痓ut this is a decrease from the 43% recorded鈥痠n February 2023.聽
This question was used to separate the sample into those who knew of鈥疓eneration Aviation (answered 鈥淵es, I have heard of it and know what鈥痠t is鈥�) and those who鈥痙idn鈥檛鈥�(answered 鈥淵es,鈥疘 have鈥痟eard of it, but鈥痙on鈥檛鈥痥now what it is鈥� or 鈥淣o,鈥疘 have鈥痭ot heard鈥痮f it鈥�) for the subsequent questions listed.鈥嬧��
Are you aware of the Generation Aviation programme?
| Statement | February 2023 (89 responses) | March 2024 (65 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| No, I have not heard of it | 43% | 29% |
| Yes, I have heard of it but don鈥檛 know what it is | 30% | 25% |
| Yes, I have heard of it and know what it is | 27% | 46% |
Results from those who know the Generation Aviation programme
This section outlines results from those who said they knew of the Generation Aviation programme (answering 鈥淵es, I have heard of it and know what it is鈥�). The results are primarily from the March 2024 survey, but where comparisons have been made to the February 2023 baseline survey, this will be made clear.
Awareness of different elements of the programme聽
The most well-known elements鈥�(answered aware or very aware) of the Generation Aviation programme were the Aviation Ambassadors 鈥�(97%), the鈥� Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and the鈥痳each for the sky challenge鈥痜und (both 80%).鈥� Aviation Ambassadors was the element with the highest proportion of responders answering very aware, with 57% of people selecting this response option.聽
The elements with the least鈥痑wareness (not at all aware and鈥痭ot very aware combined) were鈥痶he future aviation skills research鈥�(60%), cost of pilot training鈥痳esearch鈥� (57%) and educational鈥痯artnerships (53%).鈥� The cost of pilot training research鈥痺as the element with the highest鈥痯roportion of participants not at鈥痑ll aware (20%), while Aviation鈥疉mbassadors and reach for the鈥痵ky challenge fund had the鈥痩east (0%).
How aware are you, if at all, of the following elements of the Generation Aviation programme?
30 responses were received.
| Scheme | Very aware | Aware | Not very aware | Not at all aware | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Ambassadors | 57% | 40% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| Reach for the sky challenge fund | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
| CAA STEM programme | 40% | 40% | 17% | 3% | 0% |
| Recruitment events | 13% | 37% | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| Educational Partnerships | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 0% |
| Cost of pilot training research | 27% | 17% | 37% | 20% | 0% |
| Future aviation skills research | 10% | 30% | 43% | 17% | 0% |
As a follow up, respondents were asked to indicate the elements they said they were aware of and to provide details on how they had heard about them. Some participants were aware of certain elements of the programme through being part of the programme in some way, for example, knowing an Aviation Ambassador, contributing to specific research, sitting on the board at associations, or attending launch events. Others knew of different elements of the programme through being in contact with the DfT generally, being in contact with the Aviation Skills team and being in contact with the CAA. This contact was through various partnerships which the DfT has with organisations, through networking events and via outreach work that both the DfT and CAA have done on promoting careers in aviation. Awareness was also raised through press releases, social media, or through direct contact with airports.
Relationship between the UK government and aviation industry
When those who knew of the Generation Aviation programme were asked to rate the relationship between the aviation industry and government within the last year, almost 6鈥痠n 10 (57%) rated it as good or very good in the March 2024 survey (a 10 percentage point decrease from February 2023).鈥疉round a fifth (17%)鈥痳ated it as poor or very poor (although only 4% rated it as poor in February 2023), 20% thought it was neither poor nor good (versus 21% in February 2023) and 7% didn鈥檛鈥痥now (versus 8% in February 2023).鈥��
Overall, how would you rate the relationship between UK government and the aviation industry within the last year?
| Statement | February 2023 (24 responses) | March 2024 (30 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| Net: Poor | 4% | 17% |
| Neither poor nor good | 21% | 20% |
| Net: Good | 67% | 57% |
| Don鈥檛 know | 8% | 7% |
When rating the relationship between industry and government in different areas, championing the sector (52%) and collaboration (45%) were鈥痬ost frequently rated as good or very good by those who knew of Generation Aviation in March 2024. This was closely followed by outreach (42%). Signposting training and opportunities had the worst overall鈥痳ating (31% poor), along with championing the sector (21% very poor and poor, with 7% considering this very poor) and outreach (21% poor).
How would you rate the relationship between the UK government and the aviation sector in the following areas within the last year?
| Area | Very good | Good | Neither poor nor good | Poor | Very poor | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Championing the sector | 7% | 45% | 17% | 14% | 7% | 10% |
| Collaboration | 7% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 3% | 10% |
| Outreach | 14% | 28% | 21% | 21% | 0% | 17% |
| Signposting training/opportunities | 0% | 31% | 14% | 31% | 0% | 24% |
| Research and data | 0% | 25% | 43% | 11% | 4% | 18% |
All questions had 29 responses apart from the research and data question which had 28 responses.
Participants were then asked to rate their agreement with the statement of:
- the aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme聽
- I know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme
In response to the March 2024 survey, of those who were aware of Generation Aviation, 33% agreed that鈥痶he aviation industry had been appropriately鈥痓riefed about the Generation鈥疉viation programme, a decrease from 42% in February 2023.鈥�疉round a quarter (27% versus 21% in February 2023)鈥痙isagreed鈥痑nd鈥痑 further 4 in 10鈥�(40%) neither agreed nor disagreed, compared to 29% in February 2023.
Around three quarters of participants agreed that they knew how to get involved with Generation Aviation鈥�(73%) when responding to the March 2024 survey, an increase from the 61%鈥痳ecorded the previous year. Around 1 in 10 disagreed with this statement (13% versus 17% in February 2023), which is also the same percentage that neither agreed or鈥痙isagreed (13% versus 22% in February 2023).
Please rate the extent to which you agree with the following statements about the Generation Aviation programme?
| Statement | Net: Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Net: Agree | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme (February 2023, 24 responses) | 21% | 29% | 42% | 8% |
| I know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme (February 2023, 24 responses) | 17% | 22% | 61% | 0% |
| The aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme (March 2024, 30 responses) | 27% | 40% | 33% | 0% |
| I know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme (March 2024, 30 responses) | 13% | 13% | 73% | 0% |
In the March 2024 survey for the statements of 鈥淭he aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme鈥� and 鈥淚 know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme鈥�, 鈥渄on鈥檛 know鈥� was no longer a response option.
Effectiveness of Generation Aviation
When asked how effective the Generation Aviation programme is at achieving its aims, just over half of those who knew the programme thought鈥痠t was moderately effective (52% in March 2024 versus 58% in February 2023), though no respondents thought it was very effective in either survey.鈥疉round 14% of respondents to the March 2024 survey rated it as not very effective (versus 17% in February 2023) while 7% thought it鈥痺as not鈥痑t all effective (versus 4% in February 2023) and a further 28%鈥痙idn鈥檛鈥痥now (versus 21% in February 2023).鈥��
How effective, if at all, do you think the Generation Aviation programme is at achieving its aims?
| Statement | February 2023 (24 responses) | March 2024 (29 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| Not at all effective | 4% | 7% |
| Not very effective | 17% | 14% |
| Moderately effective | 58% | 52% |
| Very effective | 0% | 0% |
| Don鈥檛 know | 21% | 28% |
When asked about how effective elements of the programme are in achieving their aims in March 2024, Aviation Ambassadors (69%) and reach for the sky鈥痗hallenge fund (66%) had the highest proportion of very or moderately effective responses, while the cost of pilot training research and鈥痳ecruitment events had the lowest (17%). The worst rated element was the cost of pilot training research with鈥�45% of respondents rating it as鈥痭ot very or not at all effective (with 17% rating it鈥痺as not鈥痑t all effective).
How effective, if at all, do you think the following elements of the Generation Aviation programme are in achieving its aims?
29 responses were received.
| Scheme | Very effective | Moderately effective | Not very effective | Not at all effective | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Ambassadors | 31% | 38% | 10% | 3% | 17% |
| Reach for the sky challenge fund | 28% | 38% | 10% | 0% | 24% |
| CAA STEM programme | 10% | 45% | 17% | 0% | 28% |
| Educational Partnerships | 3% | 34% | 14% | 0% | 48% |
| Future aviation skills research | 0% | 21% | 17% | 7% | 55% |
| Recruitment events | 3% | 14% | 24% | 7% | 52% |
| Cost of pilot training research | 0% | 17% | 28% | 17% | 38% |
Results from those who didn鈥檛 know of the Generation Aviation programme
This section outlines results from those who said that they didn鈥檛 know of the Generation Aviation programme (answered 鈥淣o, I have not heard of it鈥� or 鈥淵es, I have heard of it but don鈥檛 know what it is鈥�). The results are primarily from the March 2024 survey, but where comparisons have been made to the February 2023 baseline survey, this will be made clear.
Awareness of different elements of the Generation Aviation programme
The most well-known elements (answered with aware or very aware)鈥痑mongst鈥痶hose who said they didn鈥檛 know鈥痑bout Generation Aviation鈥痺ere鈥痶he Aviation Ambassadors (43%), CAA鈥�STEM programme鈥�(32%)鈥痑nd鈥痳each for the sky鈥痗hallenge fund (29%).鈥嬄�
The elements with the least awareness鈥�(answered with not very or not at all aware)鈥痺ere the future aviation skills鈥痳esearch and educational鈥痯artnerships (both 83%), cost of pilot鈥痶raining research (77%) and鈥痳ecruitment events (74%).鈥� The cost of pilot training research and鈥痳each for the sky challenge fund鈥痺ere the elements with the highest鈥痯roportion of participants not at all aware (60%), whist the CAA STEM鈥痯rogramme had the least (34%).
How aware are you, if at all, of the following elements of the Generation Aviation programme?
35 responses were received.
| Scheme | Very aware | Aware | Not very aware | Not at all aware | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Ambassadors | 14% | 29% | 14% | 40% | 3% |
| CAA STEM programme | 6% | 26% | 31% | 34% | 3% |
| Reach for the sky challenge fund | 9% | 20% | 9% | 60% | 3% |
| Recruitment events | 3% | 20% | 23% | 51% | 3% |
| Cost of pilot training research | 9% | 9% | 17% | 60% | 6% |
| Educational partnerships | 6% | 9% | 26% | 57% | 3% |
| Future aviation skills research | 3% | 9% | 26% | 57% | 6% |
As a follow up, respondents were asked to indicate the elements they said they were aware of and provide details on how they heard about them. Respondents were aware of certain elements of the programme through participation in the programme in some way, for example, receiving a grant, being approached to attend events and developing potential partnerships. Others had heard about different elements through:聽
- being in contact with an Aviation Ambassador 聽
- promotional material and social media 聽
- departmental updates and meetings聽
- attending outreach events
Relevancy of Generation Aviation
Around 8 in 10 (83%) thought that the Generation Aviation programme was relevant to their role, with 49% saying it was very relevant. A further 34% stated it seemed relevant. Around 2 in鈥�10 (17%) thought that the programme was not鈥痸ery relevant to their role and nobody responded that the Generation Aviation programme was not at all鈥痳elevant.鈥�
Relationship between the UK government and aviation industry
Those who were unaware of Generation Aviation were then asked to rate the relationship between the aviation industry and government. In March 2024, 17% rated it as good or very good in comparison to 22% in February 2023.鈥疉round 3 in 10 (31%) rated it as poor or very poor, compared to the 40% recorded the previous year. A further 43%鈥痶hought it was neither poor nor good, compared to 29% in February 2023 and 9%鈥痳esponded that they didn鈥檛鈥痥now in both surveys.
Overall, how would you rate the relationship between the UK government and aviation industry within the last year?
| 鈥婼迟补迟别尘别苍迟 | February 2023 (65 responses) | March 2024 (35 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| Net: Poor | 40% | 31% |
| Neither poor nor good | 29% | 43% |
| Net: Good | 22% | 17% |
| Don鈥檛 know | 9% | 9% |
In the March 2024 survey, when rating the relationship between industry and government in different areas, championing the sector was rated as the鈥痬ost poor鈥痮r鈥痸ery poor (49%), followed by collaboration (46%) and signposting training and opportunities (43%). Outreach was the highest rated area with鈥痑round 1 in 10 rating it as good (11%).鈥疦o鈥痑reas were rated very good.
How would you rate the relationship between the UK government and aviation industry in the following areas within the last year?
35 responses were received.
| Scheme | Very good | Good | Neither poor nor good | Poor | Very poor | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outreach | 0% | 11% | 29% | 20% | 17% | 23% |
| Championing the sector | 0% | 9% | 34% | 23% | 26% | 9% |
| Collaboration | 0% | 9% | 29% | 26% | 20% | 17% |
| Research and data | 0% | 3% | 40% | 20% | 14% | 23% |
| Signposting training/opportunities | 0% | 3% | 34% | 23% | 20% | 20% |
Participants were then asked to rate their agreement with 2 different statements: 聽
- 鈥楾he aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme鈥�
- 鈥業 know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme鈥�
Amongst the responders to the March 2024 survey who did not know of the Generation Aviation programme, 62% disagreed that the aviation industry had been appropriately briefed about the programme (versus 72% in February 2023),鈥痺hilst only 6% agreed (versus 2% in February 2023). A further 31% neither鈥痑greed nor disagreed (versus 17% in February 2023).鈥� 聽
Around 8 in 10 (80%) responders to the March 2024 disagreed or strongly disagreed that they knew how to get involved with Generation Aviation programme (versus 78% in February 2023), while only鈥�6% agreed in both surveys. A further 14% neither agreed nor disagreed (versus 13% in February 2023)鈥�.
Please rate the extent to which you agree with the following statements about the Generation Aviation programme?
| Statement | Net: Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Net: Agree | Don鈥檛 know |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme (February 2023, 64 responses) | 72% | 17% | 2% | 9% |
| I know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme (February 2023, 64 responses) | 78% | 13% | 6% | 3% |
| The aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme (March 2024, 35 responses) | 62% | 31% | 6% | 0% |
| I know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme (March 2024, 35 responses) | 80% | 14% | 6% | 0% |
In the March 2024 survey, for the statements of 鈥淭he aviation industry has been appropriately briefed on the Generation Aviation programme鈥� and 鈥淚 know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme鈥�, 鈥渄on鈥檛 know鈥� was no longer an response
Comparing the results of those who know Generation Aviation and those who don鈥檛 know Generation Aviation in March 2024
Almost 6 in 10 (57%) of those who knew of Generation Aviation thought the relationship between the UK鈥痝overnment and the aviation industry has been good or very good within the last year. This is compared to those鈥痺ho don鈥檛 know Generation Aviation, where only 17% rated the relationship as good or very good.鈥� 聽
Almost one third (31%) of those who didn鈥檛 know of Generation Aviation rated the relationship as poor or very poor compared to only 17% of those who knew of Generation Aviation, in this group nobody rated the relationship as very poor.
Overall, how would you rate the relationship between the UK government and the aviation industry within the last year?
| Rating | Those who don鈥檛 know Generation Aviation (35 responses) | Those who know Generation Aviation (30 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| Very poor | 11% | 0% |
| Poor | 20% | 17% |
| Neither poor nor good | 43% | 20% |
| Good | 14% | 50% |
| Very good | 3% | 7% |
| Don鈥檛 know | 9% | 7% |
When asking participants to rate their agreement on the statement 鈥淚 know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme鈥�, 73% of those who knew of Generation Aviation agreed that they knew how to get involved, compared to only 6% of those who didn鈥檛 know Generation Aviation (6%). Furthermore, only 13% of those who knew of Generation Aviation disagreed that they knew how to get involved, with nobody strongly disagreeing. This is in comparison to 80% of those who didn鈥檛 know of Generation Aviation, disagreeing that they know how to get involved with the programme.
I know how to get involved with the Generation Aviation programme
| Rating | Those who don鈥檛 know Generation Aviation (35 responses) | Those who know Generation Aviation (30 responses) |
|---|---|---|
| Strongly disagree | 37% | 0% |
| Disagree | 43% | 13% |
| Neither agree nor disagree | 14% | 13% |
| Agree | 6% | 53% |
| Strongly agree | 0% | 20% |
All participants鈥� feedback on relationship with government and the Generation Aviation programme, in March 2024
In the March 2024 survey, all participants were asked to provide written answers in response to questions about government engagement with the aviation industry and the effectiveness of Generation Aviation. These questions were not mandatory and so response numbers differ based on how many participants decided not to answer. It should be noted that where answers to the question 鈥榳hat is working well鈥櫬� were negative, these responses were instead analysed as part of the 鈥榳hat could be improved鈥� question. This means that base sizes may be slightly lower or higher than specified across questions.
Participants were asked to provide information on what they thought was working well when considering UK government engagement with the aviation industry and 37 responses were received. The themes identified were:
- some participants identified engagement鈥痺ith the department鈥痑s working well, with the government being鈥痵een as having an interest in the sector and鈥痺illing to promote skills and job opportunities
- government is seen to be effective at outreach鈥痑ctivities,鈥痳aising awareness鈥痮f aviation鈥痗areers, inspiring young people to join the industry and advocating the importance of aviation
- some engagement and outreach activities mentioned included representation at鈥痚vents and work done in social media channels
- specific activities mentioned included鈥痶he CAA STEM work, reach for the sky鈥� challenge fund,鈥痑viation ambassadors, work on developing a first officer apprenticeship programme, early鈥痚ngagement on the鈥疓lobal Aviation and Aerospace Skills Task force and鈥痶he inclusion of鈥痗ommercial aviation representatives in鈥痟igh profile events
- some of the responses provided also suggest that there is a group of participants who felt that鈥痭othing, or very little,鈥痺as working鈥痶o promote the visibility of Generation Aviation
An industry stakeholder聽said:
I think the emphasis on outreach to young people and targeting under-represented groups is effective.鈥�
An industry stakeholder聽said:
The aviation ambassadors and having representatives who work in industry is a helpful bridge between the aviation industry and organisations. Individual civil servants working in aviation at the DfT do engage well with organisations such as ours.鈥�
A second question was asked on UK government engagement with the aviation industry. For this activity, participants were asked to provide their thoughts on anything they think could be improved and 42 responses were received. The themes identified were:
- improvement in鈥痗ommunication for updates, general communication around wider strategy, aims and goals. It was鈥痵uggested that鈥痳egular briefings through industry forums should be established鈥痶o provide feedback on future skills needs and to hear about available鈥痜unding initiatives. Communication could be made through different mediums to capture industry interest when those in the industry have little time to鈥痵pecifically look for these initiatives
- the industry wants a more鈥痸aried team to engage鈥痺ith by increasing the number of industry experts in government (such as those working in the CAA), plus increasing鈥痺orking alignment with other sources via engagement with equivalent teams鈥痠n the sector (additional to engaging with government affairs teams). There was also a suggestion to鈥痑llow the public to be represented in some form
- there was a range of comments about鈥痚ducation and training with more recognition and support for鈥痑pprenticeships plus support for smaller firms to offer鈥痑pprenticeships. The鈥痗ost of training鈥痑nd VAT on mandatory training were frequently cited as being a prohibitive factor in the technical development of the workforce聽聽
- there were multiple comments鈥痗alling for鈥痶he greater protection of airfields from closure and housing developments
- a range of responders felt that government should provide鈥痓etter advocacy鈥痮f the aviation sector, showing public support in a more proactive鈥痺ay鈥嬄�
- suggestions were made to decrease the number of requests made to industry as they have limited resource compared to previous years
Further questions then turned to focus on the Generation Aviation programme. The first question asked participants to provide details on what, if anything, they think is working well and 36 responses were received. The themes identified were:
- respondents particularly valued how Generation Aviation has promoted the visibility of the aviation sector through participation at various events, conducting outreach work at schools and colleges plus engaging with not-for-profit organisations. This work in turn has generated interest amongst younger people and helped to improve diversity in the sector. The Aviation Ambassadors programme was seen as particularly effective in achieving this as it helped to raise awareness of employment opportunities within the sector
- collaboration and partnerships arising from Generation Aviation were seen to improve communication
- government financial support, through initiatives such as the reach for the sky challenge fund, have been instrumental in supporting the industry initiatives which are intended to raise awareness around career opportunities in the aviation sector
- there were a range of participants who felt that nothing, or very little, was working currently and others who were not sure
An industry stakeholder聽said:
Its existence鈥痠n itself is鈥痑 very good thing.鈥疘t鈥檚鈥�(sic) pillars are just right, and it take the right鈥痑pproach to industry collaboration.
An industry stakeholder聽said:
We think the aviation ambassador programme is a鈥痝reat way of engaging industry representatives and鈥痟aving a group who can advocate for鈥痷nderrepresented people in the industry. We also鈥痶hink the RFTS challenge fund is really important to鈥痚nsure that grass root organisations can engage鈥痬ore young people within the sector.
An industry stakeholder聽said:
I think it鈥檚 great to have the involvement of people from within the sector via the Aviation Ambassador programme who can draw upon their own personal lived experiences to highlight and target key messages.
A second question was also asked in relation to the Generation Aviation programme. Participants were asked to provide insight into anything they think could be improved with 35 responses received. The themes identified were:
- the most cited improvements were an increase in鈥痸isibility,鈥痯romotion, communication, regular updates on the programme and鈥痚ngagement.鈥�婽his supports the fact that many respondents were unaware of the programme at the time of completing the survey
- there were鈥痵uggestions to鈥痠mprove visibility in new spaces with all鈥痑spects of the aviation industry to be considered and not just the commercial elements,鈥痓y other government departments, local authorities and鈥疌hambers of Commerce
- there were suggestions to improve collaboration, with greater opportunities for businesses to engage with鈥痚ducational institutions, those鈥�檕n the ground鈥� who鈥痟ave experience and know what works plus collaboration across different elements of the programme. This is to ensure all bodies are鈥痑ligned and up to date with developments
- the need to adopt a targeted forward look approach, producing action鈥痯oints from independent reports as well as鈥痮verall horizon scanning for future activity
An industry stakeholder聽said:
Visibility needs to reach outside the industry to attract new people in aviation. In addition its (sic) important not to just focus on civil aviation, but charter, military, space and all aspects. There needs to be more impact, currently it seems to be more of a promotion for the DfT than actually to promote aviation roles.
An industry stakeholder聽said:
鈥e would like to see more opportunities for businesses to engage with educational institutions and get the leaders of schools excited about careers in aviation.鈥�
An industry stakeholder聽said:
More horizon scanning on how the Government can proactively feed into the sectors鈥� plans on skills so its (sic) not as reactive. Earlier criticisms are not so much focused on Generation Aviation, which has been very well progressed - but broader feedback on UK Government support of the aviation sector.
Participants were lastly asked about their preferences for keeping up to date with the Generation Aviation programme (March 2024)
All participants, a total of 64, were asked to select the ways in which they would like to be kept informed regarding the Generation Aviation programme (as many as appropriate). The most selected option was through email by the DfT (81%), followed by email from industry (52%), social media鈥�(39%) and鈥痳egular industry forums (38%). Just over half (52%) wanted to be kept informed via a newsletter from the department. Those who provided further comment suggested updates on the programme at industry鈥痳oundtables attended by the department, being directly involved and through media鈥痗overage. A small percentage (5%) said that they didn鈥檛 want to be kept up to date with the programme.聽聽
When asking how often, if at all, participants would like to be kept up to date with the Generation Aviation programme (62 responses), around 6 in 10 (59%) wanted to be kept informed on a quarterly basis, while a further 3 in 10 (31%)鈥痺anted to be kept up to date more frequently than this.鈥疧nly 2% wanted to be鈥痥ept up to date on a 6 monthly basis, with a further 3% preferring annual updates. A small percentage (5%) did not want to be kept up to date鈥痑t all.鈥� Reasons for not wanting to be kept up to date included concerns around email inboxes being clogged up, lack of relevance and lack of open debate on Generation Aviation activities.