CG67860 - Reliefs: employee-ownership trusts: 'disqualifying events': clawback from vendor period

Throughout this manual, all legislative references are to (鈥淭CGA92鈥) unless otherwise stated.

S236O TCGA92 and Sch 37, Para 3(c) Finance Act 2014

Even where the relief requirements in section 236H(1) are met, see听CG67801, a claim may not be made and relief previously given will be withdrawn if certain events occur in the four tax years following the year of disposal, or for disposals before 30 October 2024, the tax year following the disposal. Those are known as 鈥榙isqualifying events鈥 and they occur when

  • the settlement ceases to meet the 鈥榯rustee residence requirement鈥.
  • C ceases to meet the 鈥榯rading requirement鈥.
  • The settlement ceases to meet the 鈥榓ll-employee benefit requirement鈥.
  • The settlement ceases to meet the 鈥榯rustee independence requirement鈥.
  • The settlement ceases to meet the 鈥榗ontrolling interest requirement鈥.
  • The 鈥榩articipator fraction鈥 exceeds two-fifths.
  • The trustees act in a way which the trusts, as required by the 鈥榓ll-employee benefit requirement鈥, do not permit.

The 鈥榯rustee residence requirement鈥 and 鈥榯rustee independence requirement鈥 do not apply to transactions before 30 October 2024.

Example 27

Azmidiske Widgets Limited EOT was established on 12 March 2015.听 It acquired 51% of the ordinary share capital of Azmidiske Widgets Limited from Anthony on 16 March 2015.听 The relief requirements were met, where necessary until the end of the tax year, and so Anthony anticipated being able to make a claim that the disposal took place at no gain and no loss for capital gains tax purposes.听 On 4 May 2015 Azmidiske Widgets Limited went into partnership with another company, and the partners carried on business through the partnership from that date.听 Azmidiske Widgets Limited ceased to meet the 鈥榯rading requirement鈥, see听CG67830, from 4 May 2015, which was a 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥.听 Anthony could therefore no longer make a claim for relief.

For settlements created before 10 December 2013, when deciding whether there has been a 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥 on the grounds that the trust has ceased to meet the 鈥榓ll-employee benefit requirement鈥, bear in mind that the settlement cannot be treated as meeting the 鈥榓ll-employee benefit requirement鈥 after the time of the disposal unless it was treated as meeting the requirement at that time.听 In other words, if the settlement actually met the requirement at the time of the disposal and it subsequently ceased to actually meet the requirement, the fact that it could be treated as meeting the requirement is not enough to allow relief.

If at the time of the disposal the settlement was treated as meeting the 鈥榓ll-employee benefit requirement鈥 and then later actually meets it, the settlement cannot again be treated as meeting the requirement.

See听CG67822for examples that illustrate the two paragraphs immediately above.

For the distinction between a settlement which actually meets the 鈥榓ll-employee benefit requirement鈥 and one which is treated as doing so, see听CG67844.

If the settlement would cease to meet the trustee residence requirement because of the death of a trustee, or the trustee independence requirement because of the death of a trustee or the death of a director of a company that is a trustee of the settlement, this can be ignored if the requirement is met again within 6 months of the death.

Example 27A

The Taurus Widgets Limited EOT was established on 1 January 2025 by acquiring 75% of the ordinary share capital of Taurus Widgets Limited. The three trustees of the EOT are: Rosanna (the former owner of the company, an excluded participator), Maxim (an independent trustee), and Emily (an employee representative). Neither Maxim nor Emily are participators.

Maxim dies on 18 July 2026. The 鈥榯rustee independence requirement鈥 ceases to be met, as excluded participators now constitute 50% of the trustees.

A new independent trustee is appointed on 10 September 2026. The 鈥榯rustee independence requirement鈥 is met again from this date, as excluded participators now constitute fewer than 50% of the trustees. As the 鈥榯rustee independence requirement鈥 was met again within six months of Maxim鈥檚 death, the 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥 which would otherwise have occurred on 18 July 2026 is ignored.

If the settlement ceases to meet the trustee residence requirement or the trustee independence requirement for any reason other than death (for example, a resignation of a trustee or director), then a disqualifying event would occur.

Where a 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥 occurs, no claim for relief may be made by P on or after the day on which it takes place.

Where P has already made a claim for relief and a 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥 then occurs, the claim is revoked and the chargeable gains and allowable losses of any person, for any chargeable period, are to be calculated as if the claim had never been made.听 Adjustments to be made in respect of any person in order to give effect to the change may be made at any time, regardless of the time limits that would otherwise apply.

If more than one 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥 occurs, the date of the first to take place is the relevant date for the purposes of the paragraphs above.

If capital gains tax becomes payable, S280 may allow the tax, that would otherwise be payable in full, to be paid by instalments provided the consideration, taken into account in the computation of the gain, is payable by instalments over a period exceeding 18 months and that continues beyond the date on which the tax would otherwise be due and payable. See CG14910.

The 鈥榩articipator fraction鈥 exceeding two-fifths, see听CG67855, is to be disregarded if

  • the period that it does so lasts no more than 6 months and
  • the fraction exceeded two-fifths during that period by reason of events outside the reasonable control of the trustees.

In relation to relief in respect of disposals on or after 6 April 2014 and before 26 June 2014 this paragraph does not apply.听 See听CG67862for the consequences of a 鈥榙isqualifying event鈥 in relation to such disposals.