伊人直播

Example

Frank owns and farms Orchard Farm and has done so for 20 years.

In October 2008, he sells Orchard Farm for 拢600,000 and buys Manor Farm for 拢800,000 to increase the scope of his farming operations. Both transactions are at arm鈥檚 length. Both prices are wholly attributable to agricultural value.

In April 2010, Frank dies. Manor Farm then has an agricultural value of 拢1,000,000. The two year occupation condition in IHTA84/S118 (1) is satisfied.

A practical way to give effect to IHTA84/S118 (3) in such circumstances is to adopt the following apportionment:

• The agricultural value of Orchard Farm at time of sale (on the facts, the sale price), divided by
• the agricultural value of Manor Farm at the time of the purchase (on the facts, the purchase price), multiplied by
• the agricultural value of Manor Farm at date of death or in figures

Or (拢600,000 梅 拢800,000) 脳 拢1,000,000 = 拢750,000

The result of this approach is that on A鈥檚 death the agricultural relief on Manor Farm is limited to 拢750,000. The excess of 拢250,000 does not qualify for relief. You should ignore the costs of sale and of purchase.

If an alternative approach is suggested, you should seek advice from Technical.